1H nmr of Substituted Benzenes
A Worksheet
Remember, the chemical environment of a proton determines where it will resonate when placed in a
magnetic field, i.e. determines its chemical shift. Charge distribution in aromatic rings is reflected in the
chemical shifts of protons attached to the rings. Charge distribution is another way of discussing electron
density. The pi-electron distribution in aromatic rings is strongly affected by electron donation or
withdrawal by conjugated substituents through resonance. So charge distribution or electron density can
be predicted by drawing out all the resonance structures which are possible. Large electron density (or
negative charge) shields the proton and thus shifts it upfield. Small electron density (or positive charge)
deshields the proton and shifts it downfield.
There are two things to keep in mind when analyzing the 1H nmr spectrum of protons attached to
an aromatic ring (also called aromatic protons).
1. Electron density around the proton of interest determines its chemical shift.
One normally speaks of chemical shift difference from benzene protons (7.24 ppm). Consider
aniline for example. Would we expect the chemical shift of the ortho protons to be shifted upfield from
benzene (< 7.24 ppm) or downfield from benzene (> 7.24 ppm)? To answer this question we need to draw
the various resonance structures of aniline. These structures demonstrate the strong electron donation into
the ring by the nitrogen substituent.
H
H
Notice in the first resonance structure there is a negative charge located on the carbon to which an ortho
This proton has lots of
electron density around it
proton is attached. This means it is experiencing greater electron density than it would if there were no
nitrogen attached to the ring, therefore we would expect it to be shifted upfield with respect to benzene. In
fact, it comes at 6.5 ppm. Draw the other resonance structures of aniline in the space provided and predict
the relative chemical shift of the meta and para protons.
2. Splitting by adjacent protons only occurs if the chemical shift of the two protons are significantly
An example of where this plays a significant role in the appearance of the aromatic region in the 1H
nmr spectrum is toluene.
There are obviously 3
different types of aromatic protons, however, there is only one signal in the 1H nmr
spectrum in the aromatic region. This signal is a singlet
at 7.10 ppm. Although methyl is an electron
donating substituent, as evidenced by the observed chemical shift being upfield from benzene, it is only
weakly so. It does not donate enough electron density to cause a magnetic non-equivalence at 60 MHz.
Since the protons have the same chemical shift they do not split each other and therefore a singlet is
Splitting is observed when the chemical shifts of aromatic protons are significantly different. One
way to get such differences in the chemical shift is to have both an electron donating group and an electron
withdrawing group on the same ring. An example is p-nitroaniline, draw all the resonance forms, then
predict the chemicals shifts (relative to benzene) and the splitting pattern one would observe.
The only way to learn the process of predicting the chemical shifts of aromatic protons on substituted
benzenes by resonance theory is by practice. The following examples will help accomplish this.
Write the resonance structures for each of the
following compounds based on the charge
distribution in each structure which protons will be shielded (come upfield) and deshielded (come
downfield) with respect to the protons in benzene?
CH
3
CH
3
NH
2
The last example contains chlorine, a halogen. We have not discussed halogens in the context of nmr yet.
However, remember how it affected the aromatic ring towards electrophilic aromatic substitution? Was it
an electron donator or an electron withdrawer? The same principles hold here. Look on page two of your
other handout for the actual 1H nmr of this molecule. Chlorine has essentially no observable effect on the
chemical shift of the protons on the ring because the electron donation (by resonance) is canceled out by its
electron withdrawing ability (by induction). This is also true of the other halogens.
NH
2